atsiang
Nov 3 2009, 10:05 PM
As I have read in previous posts, FSX is heavily dependent on clock speed rather than number of cores. Will I see any improvement if I upgraded from my current system which is an AMD dual core X2 6000 (3.1Ghz) to an Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400? My current system has 4 gig RAM and evga 9600 GT Low Power GPU.
Thanks for all your advice.
ryanbatcund
Nov 4 2009, 12:49 PM
Not a whole lot.... maybe some improvement in smoothness. If you're going to upgrade go with the Core i7 line, like an overclocked 920
It's not worth the cost to go from a AMD6000 to that Q.... imho and I use the same cpu as you.
Now if you overclock the CPU a lot, like at a minimum to 3.4 it would help....but you'll need a good cooler for that
atsiang
Nov 5 2009, 01:51 PM
Thanks for your response.
Suppose I upgraded from my current CPU X2 6000 to Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 which is the highest clock speed, would that bring about a significant increase in performance?
TechguyMaxC
Nov 5 2009, 02:20 PM
K8 is pretty slow compared to Conroe/Penryn. I'd say you could see significant gains, particularly when overclocking.
Once upon a time I had an Opteron 175. Dual core 2.2GHz dual 1MB L2 caches, overclocked to 2.5-2.7 (depending upon ambient temps). An X2 6000 is in the same performance class as that CPU, and that's respectable. I had that chip back in 2005-2006. The slowest machine I own/maintain for friends/family is in the same performance class. In a web surfing machine.
Upgrades are *cheap* right now. If you really want to do it, might as well spend a few bucks more for a Lynnfield i7/i5 system.
atsiang
Nov 6 2009, 07:30 PM
Thanks for all your responses. Folks have been helpful. After much digging, I'll be going with AMD II Phenom 965.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.